It 's amazing that newspapers have "wash" the two sensational news coming from Portugal. A (dramatic) is implicit in the words of Pope: Pope prophecy about killing and the slaughter of cardinals and bishops, addressed not to the past, but our near future (I'll talk about later).
But another is black and white and this is the "fourth secret" (that part has not yet published in the Third Secret) exists and the Pope's words on the scandal of pedophilia are proof.
The Pope is committed to making a major operation-even truth about Fatima, at the cost of contradicting the version of the Vatican secretariat of state. Here is the comparison between their words and those of the pope.
The then Secretary of State Cardinal Sodano, 13 May 2000, the world solemnly announcing the publication of the third secret, explaining that the attack coincided with the pope in 1981 and the persecutions of the twentieth century, said: "The events referenced in the third part of the 'secret' of Fatima refers now seem part of the past. "
successor, Bertone, has also eliminated the conservative "look" and to reiterate that the secret concerned the attack on the pope in 1981 and had already achieved everything, literally wrote (on page 79 of its volume) "The doggedness media is no intention of capacitors that prophecy is not open to the future, is made in the past, the event indicated (the attack on the pope, nda). We do not want to face facts. "
Now Pope Benedict XVI tells us the exact opposite, namely that the third secret concerns events following the bombing of 1981, as the current scandal of pedophilia and even events that are still in our future.
Ratzinger has stated:
"Besides this grand vision of the suffering of the Pope, that we can in the first instance report to Pope John Paul II, are given the reality of the future of the Church, which gradually grow and show and then ... are suffering the Church announced that ... As for the news that today we can find in this message, there is also the fact that not only come from outside attacks on the Pope and the Church, but the sufferings of the Church is just inside the Church, the sin that exists in the Church. "
The attack of 1981 is not in the words of Benedict XVI, and then is referred to as "the" completion of the third secret.
It speaks only of "the suffering of John Paul II", which is merged with those of other popes (referred to in the second part of the Secret). Benedict XVI placed the fulfillment of the Third Secret in the years following the 1981 bombing and in our own future "is the reality of the future as they develop and show themselves," said "the sufferings of the Church that are advertised."
As anyone can see is the opposite of what is proclaimed by Sodano, and more dogmatically, by Bertone ("the prophecy is not open to the future, is made in the past, the event shown).
The rest was the same Sister Lucia to deny that the prophecy was delivered to the past and had made the attack in 1981. He wrote in a letter critical of the May 12, 1982.
After showing that he had already achieved the first part of the prophecy concerning the Communist revolution, World War II and the persecution of the Church, Sister Lucia, speaking of the third part of the secret, he wrote quote:
"unless yet seen the complete end of this prophecy, we see that there are going towards it little by little with great strides. "
So, in this fundamental point that was announced by the Vatican itself, Sister Lucia, one year after the bombing of Ali Agca in 1981, not only does not say that this attack is the realization of the third secret (he never said either here or elsewhere), but even quotes him, not even vaguely mentioned there. Rather he explains, "in words" that the third secret has yet to be realized. And he wrote in 1982!
We would add that on this very letter of the seer, Bertone - at that time lord - has mysteriously "erased" a phrase explosive, which contradicted his story, without giving any explanation.
But it is only one of the many anomalies of this fifty-year history that unfortunately, is full of lies, of reticence, of forcing and omissions (as I showed in my book).
But back to today. The Pope then reopened the file in such a blatant and clear that all those who in recent years rushed to pay homage to the version of the Curia have found themselves in a panic in the face of his statements that put the scandal of pedophilia in the third secret.
's father Stefano De Fiores that TG2 requested by 11 May at 20.30, clearly embarrassed, stammered: "truth be told explicitly do not find ...."
E De Fiores good! In fact, the "third secret" of the clergy no. But in the full Madonna, in which the Pope, yes. We must understand that Father De Fiores. He had written an apologetic saggetto Cardinal Bertone swearing that he had never been a part not published the "third secret" and is now the Pope himself denies that.
Vittorio Messori, a Catholic intellectual another who had left to pay homage to the curial secretary of state, yesterday's Corriere della Sera expressed the embarrassment of being denied by the Pope: "Now the vast array of 'Fatima' will ferment to show that Pope Benedict XVI has betrayed .... "
In fact Pope Benedict has never identified with the attack on the Third Secret in 1981. Inoltre – da cardinale – sottolineò che non ci sono “definizioni ufficiali, né interpretazioni obbligatorie” del Terzo segreto.
A differenza degli ecclesiastici di Curia, che hanno trasformato in dogma le proprie idee (e fandonie) Ratzinger spiegò che quelle del 2000 erano ipotesi di interpretazione. Mere ipotesi (oggi da superare).
In terzo luogo – con l’umiltà che lo caratterizza – già nel 2000, poco dopo lo svelamento del Segreto, rispondendo a una lettera rispettosa, ma critica del vescovo Pavel Hnilica sul suo commento teologico, Ratzinger non aveva esitato ad affermare che non voleva affatto “attribuire esclusivamente al passato i contenuti del segreto, in maniera semplicistica”.
In realtà Benedetto XVI, come per lo scandalo pedofilia, vuol farci capire che non bisogna mai aver paura della verità, anche quando è dolorosa o imbarazzante.
Perché non si serve Dio con la menzogna. Quando si pretende di mentire per Dio in realtà lo si fa per se stessi: Dio non ha bisogno delle nostre menzogne per difendere e costruire la sua Chiesa. Meglio fare mea culpa, perché Dio è più grande e più potente di tutti i nostri peccati.
Certo, questo atteggiamento non è compreso in Curia. Né dai “ratzingeriani” e giustamente, con affetto, Giuliano Ferrara ha scritto che sulla questione pedofilia, “detto con molta autoironia, per noi foglianti il Papa è un poco fuori linea”.
E’ vero. Perché il Papa sa più di noi e ritiene questo scandalo solo la punta dell’iceberg “terrificante” del peccato nella Chiesa (pensiamo ai verminai da lui denunciati nella Via crucis del 2005) e pensa al grande peccato dell’apostasia nella Chiesa.
E se tutto questo è “la città mezza in rovina” piena di cadaveri, descritta nella visione del Terzo segreto e se il papa ucciso non può essere il papa ferito del 1981, significa che la grande persecuzione del mondo e il grande martirio del Papa e della Chiesa è cosa del prossimo futuro.
Il Papa forse non può say so explicitly, but try to prepare his Church to this terrible trial ("the sufferings of the Church that are advertised") by giving everything in the hands of Our Lady of Fatima. Are overtime. But the newspapers have been noticed.
Antonio Socci on Free of May 13, 2010
PS About Messori and ... Bertone.
Bruno Vespa Three years ago created an entire episode of "Eastenders" to launch the book of Cardinal Bertone against me (of course without giving me the word). Title of episode: "The fourth secret does not exist" (it was an explicit reference to my controversial book "The Fourth Secret of Fatima").
Ieri sera è andata in onda un’altra confusa puntata di “Porta a porta” sulle nuove dichiarazioni del Papa a Fatima e – con mio gran divertimento – pur parlando dello stesso tema, nessuno più ha osato dire “il quarto segreto non esiste”.
Anzi, Vittorio Messori, che tre anni fa era corso ad accreditare la versione di Bertone, senza fare una piega, ha dichiarato l’opposto di quello che finora aveva affermato.
Ha detto cioè che Benedetto XVI non vede il compimento del Terzo segreto nell’attentato del 1981 e non lo ritiene concluso nel passato, ma lo vede proiettato nel futuro, considerando anche un fatto nuovo, come lo scandalo-pedofilia, parte The Secret (and it is clear that the Pope can not esserselo invented: it must therefore have derived from the full text of the Secret ...). Messori
After all this was by no means recognized he had been wrong so far, it has drawn the consequences of what he said. Just as casual Bertone.
Now, it seems to me that we can not say everything and its opposite. Or right Bertone (and the prophecy was fulfilled with the assassination attempt of 1981 and ended in the past) or right Benedict XVI and then the text of the Secret is wider, the prophecy is still open and the martyrdom of a Pope and the Church are in our future.
You can not pretend that the two opposing versions can coexist. Out of respect for logic. It would be desirable for the love of truth prevailed and a fair recognition of their mistakes ... The Pope's call to repentance, penance and self-critical examination should be taken seriously. That
SS Mother of God protect the Pope and all of us!
0 comments:
Post a Comment