Copio e incollo da Libertà & Persona
Peter Tatchell è un attivista gay che ha chiesto l'arresto di Benedetto XVI appena costui toccherà il suolo britannico. Un pazzo? Come tanti altri anticristiani intolleranti in servizio permanente, che hanno cercato di presentare il papa, prima del suo arrivo in Inghiletrra, come un mostro.
Di seguito un articolo di Francesco Colafemmina su fidesetforma.it:
Lunedì prossimo la TV inglese Channel 4 trasmetterà un documentario realizzato da tal Peter Tatchell, attivista gay particolarmente impegnato ad attaccare il Santo Padre . Questo individuo, come già messo in evidenza da Damian Thompson sul suo blog, ha realizzato più un film alla Dan Brown che un documentario, visto che il suo livello di obiettività sfiora i fondali marini più profondi...
Racconta lo stesso Tatchell che nel suo programma propagandistico si è dato da fare per intervistare vittime di abusi sessuali da parte di preti cattolici, con l'intento di accusare in ogni caso Papa Benedetto di "coperture" e "occultamenti" dei gravissimi peccati e crimini di una parte minoritaria del clero cattolico. At the same time this man poses as a defender of human rights, although it is clear that most of the rights which he relied mostly about sex in all its sauces.
But I think it has a lot to discuss what this man is openly propagating on its website (look under sex education). I refer to one of his long article on sex education in schools in 2002.
In particular there is a point of delirious Tatchell arguments that are worth repeating in full: "Spread all the facts - tell the whole truth. If education seeks to erase the ignorance and impart knowledge, then sex education has an obligation to provide all the facts and tell the whole truth about any kind of sex and relationships. This includes practices that some may find distasteful, such as sadomasochism or sodomy, and harmful behaviors such as unprotected sex and the abuse of children. Nothing must be out of bounds. The goal of speaking frankly to these thorny issues is not to encourage them, but is intended to help pupils to cope if they encounter in their future life. (...) Some practices may seem strange to some. But the difference is the spice of life . The nightmare of sexual someone can be someone else's sexual nirvana. Premise che il comportamento dev'essere consensuale, che nessuno sia offeso e che il piacere sia reciproco, le scuole dovrebbero adottare una attitudine a non giudicare e del 'vivi e lascia vivere' ."
In un altro suo articolo, sempre leggibile sul suo sito, Tatchell si dice contrario a limitare l'età del consenso ai 16 anni (lo dice anche in questo articolo) e afferma: " Fissare il consenso a 16 anni costituisce una curiosa contraddizione. Mentre si proteggono giovani minorenni, li si criminalizza allo stesso tempo. Ciò rinforza l'idea che non abbiano diritti sessuali. Considerato incapace di consentire al sesso, una attività sessuale che coinvolge un minore di 16 anni - anche se è consenziente ed entrambi i partner are the same age - is categorized as an "abuse". To deny a sexual choice for children under 16 years for consensual sex and equalize the power to remove a violent teenagers. Takes away the right to make decisions that affect their bodies. This plays into the hands of adults who wish to abuse them .
So you got it: the man who accuses the Pope of covering up cases of abuse pedophiles in the name of alleged human rights of which he himself is the organizer is the same propaganda that a pseudo sexual morality (in his article calls it just like that) under which any sexual behavior provided based on mutual consent, is considered acceptable and even expected to be taught to youngsters during special school lessons.
Frankly these words seem outrageous to a minimum and deserving of public condemnation. This gentleman accepts virtually any form of sexual behavior, including in its catalog of bestiality even child abuse. But do not stop there: even come to question the sexual freedom of minors, of teenagers (13-16 years), regardless of the type of relationship and the fact that their partners are adults or peers.
Tatchell's thought is therefore to limit incitement to pedophilia. It is not only unacceptable that a person can think, and propagate these diabolical thoughts on education of teenagers can afford impunity to the moral to the Pope, recalling old issues of abuse committed by some Catholic priests. But it is extremely odd that the construction of a controversial documentary although the figure of Pope Benedict XVI to be conferred on a person devoid of any moral authority whatsoever and objective critical sense, but rather motivated by thoughts that define perverse and criminal would be too generous. I hope that the media all over the world deal of the story, worthy of the same raise a furore ungenerous and too often wrongly directed against the Pope. On the other hand it is just further confirmation of the smallness of these enemies of Pope Benedict and the bleak misery of their thinking irrational and inhuman. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment